In August, French Vogue was criticized for sexualizing this 10-year-old model.
The battle over the 'sexual rights' of underage persons has begun. Children are being sexualized. In the view of the Illuminati, young people are being 'set free'.
Some readers have expressed disbelief that 'child sexualization' would ever take place. These readers do not understand how the Illuminati enact social change: Start small; maintain progress patiently and incrementally; form deep links between different centers (e.g., changes in the Art and Music worlds must reflect the subtle pressures being exerted at the elementary school level and television, film, radio, and magazines); ramp up crises at carefully calculated times.
As someone who has worked extensively in public relations, I know that If one person speaks up, it means at least 100 people, or maybe even a thousand, or maybe even ten thousand, have thought of and about the same thing.
Similarly, if one person commits a 'crime' within any given society, you can be sure that a vastly larger group of individuals have at least contemplated committing the same crime.
These days, we see a surprising number of overtly 'good people' -- a Fire Chief here, a Religious Education instructor there, not to mention all the priests -- being brought to task for sexual crimes against children. We could get distracted by that: we could be horrified and spend all our time wondering what this heart of darkness is, in us, that drives 'good' people to see legally underage individuals as sexually viable.
We could get distracted by the call for "A Child's Sexual Bill of Rights", sponsored by the pederast "Child Sexuality Circle." This "Bill of Rights" includes:
" Every child has the right to loving relationships, including sexual, with a parent, sibling or other responsible adult or child and shall be protected and aided in doing so by being provided with contraceptives and aids to prevent venereal disease."
and
"Each child has the right to be protected from any form of sex suppression at home or in society so that in adulthood co will be capable of living cos sex life according to cos natural desires and not according to the dictates of tradition."
Such material generated by avowed pedophiles is a distraction from the essence of the coming battle. The battle will not be won by people who seek free-ranging sexual access to the under-aged. That will never fly.
"UNIVERSAL SEXUAL FREEDOMS"
The fight for the Sexual Rights of Children will be characterized as a struggle for "universal sexual freedoms."
This is evident in a legal abstract produced by Kieran Walsh, left, a barrister and lecturer in the law faculties of both Griffith College Cork and University College Cork, as well as acting as lecturer and assistant examiner for the Law Society of Ireland. He has worked with ["children's protection" agency] Barnardos in Ireland on the issue of amending the Irish constitution to provide for children's rights and with the Irish Special Rapporteur on Child Protection.
"This paper will address the outer limits of a child's acceptable sexual experimentation. All countries have minimum ages of consent above which a person may lawfully engage in sexual activity and below which they are deemed incapable of making an informed choice as to whether to do so and hence any other person engaged in sexual activity with the child can be prosecuted.
"Society has an image of the virginal child, and any sexual activity on their part is deemed to be unnatural and the fault of some corrupting influence. Yet children engage in various forms of sexual experimentation from a relatively early age as part of their normal developmental process. This paper focuses on the sexual activity of adolescents.
"Currently the law with regard to the age of consent is in flux. Some states have a strict age of consent, red line arbitrarily set below which a child is deemed incapable of consent. Others say that a child is capable of consent to have sex with people around their own age but not with someone significantly older, a version of what is known colloquially as the young man's defense.
"This paper will argue that the age of the person with whom sexual acts are performed can be immaterial from the child's perspective. For them, the sexual act is part of growing up. I will argue that the law should recognize the ability of children to make conscious decisions and that the law should reflect the reality that adolescents are capable of forming intimate relationships and acting in a mature manner." (full abstract download available at www.inter-disciplinary.net/...2010/04/kwalshpaper.pdf)
HIDDEN AGENDA
Of course Walsh has chosen to focus on the sexual activities of 'adolescents': to dip lower would excite outrage. But his arguments, and others like them, will eventually cross the age barrier into pre-adolescent territory. It is inevitable, especially given the increasing rates of 'early puberty' occurring at ages as low as 7 or 8.
All that it will take is one court case: a seven-year-old, or a nine-year-old, with a sexually active history, of superior intelligence, who stands up in court and states, "No one coerced me. I was not the product of violent influence. I like sex. I have enjoyed my own sexuality since I became aware of my body. My parents have tried to discourage me, but I am who I am, and I will not be repressed."
Here is a sample of the arguments that will come to bear.
"Children stand within a point of human existence that is supposed to be inherently playful and exploratory. If a child is exploring his or her own body, say, via light masturbation, and that behavior is forcibly controlled and ended, then isn't the child's artistic freedom under assault?"
"If a child -- legally admittedly incapable of fully cognizant decision-making -- chooses to have sexual contact with another youth, equally legally incompetent, under what stipulations could the pair (heck, let's go for a group) be penalized?"
In the meantime, the gross forms of child sexualization have been building momentum: child beauty pageants; sexual toys for children; "gender-less" offspring; the increasing popularity of voluntary nudity and sexuality (including images) shared via cell phones and smartphones.
Make no mistake: the day will come when your children will be 'set free' sexually. And if you object, your children will be taken from you. It may take some time, but it will come.
No comments :
Post a Comment